Therefore, based on the definition of the symbol, thinking means, from the subject, wanting to give birth to that internal dialogue which, while it consents them to know they are alone, leads to them starting a further dialogue, at least between two people. A dialogue in which one accepts being, at least, two in one: not necessarily knowing each other, but recognizing each other.
Lecture by Matteo Cavalleri, “A monument to the possible”, Research week, 30.10.2010
A monument […] should represent, embody this idea almost as if it were something which isn’t completely there, or which in a certain sense is not there yet. Not because it must have its own strength and clarity, or can’t have foundations in that which precedes the present: but because, at any rate, it requires a tension still needing to be crossed, needing to be accomplished or reached. Even if it is about origin which should be an origin which is discovered in the new actions related to it.
Lecture by Matteo Cavalleri, “A monument to the possible”, Research week, 30.10.2010